Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BariatricPal

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Join BariatricPal free

  • Ask your own questions
  • Reply and follow topics
  • Message other members
  • No cost, no spam

who supports right to choose

  • Replies 5k
  • Views 301.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Jennie1976
    Jennie1976

    Okay Snuffy, I'll try to explain it a bit more simply this time. YOU SAID: "There is a general belief that the same religous orders who preach abstinence and no sex before marriage, are actually p

  • gadgetlady
    gadgetlady

    I just read this article -- even though it's old -- very potent stuff out of the UK: Fifty babies a year are alive after abortion - Times Online A few excerpts -- but the entire article is worth r

  • gadgetlady
    gadgetlady

    Well, the fact that 1/3 of unborn babies are killed by abortion isn't hypothetical. Knowing whether one of them is an "Einstein" is and will remain unknowable because once you kill someone you never

Are you Pro Life 1 member has voted

  1. 1. Are you Pro Life

    • for Pro Life
      22%
    • for pro choice
      62%
    • pro choice only for extreme cases ie Mothers in danger of death
      14%

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

I agree in the seperation of God and State and abortion is a huge example of that...it should not be made illegal because of someone elses beliefs...If you don't agree with abortion then don't have one!!! It's that easy!!!

So, everyone should just mind their own business? We shouldn't try to protect people from killing other people? Seeing that prolife people feel that an abortion kills a human being, that's like asking them to stop helping to stop injustices. If a man was going to kill a child, and felt it was okay to do so, shouldn't others step in and try to stop that killing? We have laws against that. The problem lies with the prolifers belief that the baby in the womb is actually a baby, and not a blob of tissue. Try to put those who believe that way into your shoes. If you felt that every baby that was being aborted was the killing of a human being, then you would be able to see our stance on the problem and get a sense of how we feel.

It is true that the bible nowhere mentions the word abortion. But that is because it is a fairly new term for the act. The bible also never mentions the word Trinity, either, but the 3 fold personhood of Father, Son and Holy Spirit is still real. The bible does not have the term 'The Rapture', yet bible believers know and understand that the taking away of believers in Christ before Jesus returns will happen. The word 'abortion' does not have to appear in the bible to get an understanding of what God says about the life he created in the womb.

These huge disagreements about what the Bible says and what God wants are the reason that we need to ensure the separation of church and state.

I know that born again Christians are certain that they have all the answers. But they do not. They just have the answers that make sense to THEM. And when they tread on our toes with their beliefs regarding the laws of the land, it is just the thing that reeks of discrimination and intolerance and the exact thing that causes religious wars, suicide bombs and aircraft being flown into the sides of buildings. Yes, we're back to that. 'nuff said.

And your answers make sense to you!

Please check out this link.

http://www.worshippingchristian.org/constitution_and_religion.html

The initial purpose of the first ammendment was to protect the church from government interference not the other way around. Today people who cry out 'separation of church and state' don't really get what the 1st amendment was trying to do.

patty you are completely mistaken about the First Amendment. It is not about the protection of Christians. It is to keep the government from discriminating against cetain segments of society. It is in place to ensure that people can worship however they want. It was not written to ensure that we have a Christian nation. I don't know where you read that, but you should read a little more about the history of this nation and about our founding fathers. I mean read the real truth, not the convenient truth.

United States of America125px-US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg.png

This article is part of the series:

United States Constitution

Original text of the ConstitutionPreamble

Articles of the Constitution

IIIIIIIVVVIVII

Amendments to the ConstitutionBill of Rights

IIIIIIIVV

VIVIIVIIIIXX

Subsequent Amendments

XIXIIXIIIXIVXV

XVIXVIIXVIIIXIXXX

XXIXXIIXXIIIXXIVXXV

XXVIXXVII

"First Amendment" redirects here. For other uses, see First Amendment (disambiguation).

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that expressly prohibits the United States Congress from making laws "respecting an establishment of religion" or that prohibit the free exercise of religion, infringe the freedom of speech, infringe the freedom of the press, limit the right to peaceably assemble, or limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Ok I looked at your link. No wonder you said what you did. That article is exactly what I was talking about when I referred to a convenient truth.

The author of your article has sliced and diced each word to create a meaning that the author wants it to mean. (And what you want it to mean.)

It is easy to see why you are mistaken about why the First Amendment was written. You've conjured up a convenient truth.

Just like the Repubicans are trying to conjure up a new history for the history books which is to conveniently make it look as if the Bush administration was not the worst and perhaps the most dishonest administration in history.

Ok I looked at your link. No wonder you said what you did. That article is exactly what I was talking about when I referred to a convenient truth.

The author of your article has sliced and diced each word to create a meaning that the author wants it to mean. (And what you want it to mean.)

No. Those like you who want it to be about protecting the government from church have turned the original intent of the amendment around so that it is about protecting the gov. from church instead of what it was originally written for, Which was to protect the church from gov. interference.

Why would they write up something to protect the government from religion when back then it was the churches that needed to be protected from the governments infiltration and dictatorship. They wanted to get away from that.

We are obviously not communicating well, patty. I wasn't saying, nor was the info I posted saying, that it is protecting the "government from church" which is ludicrous.

You can read for yourself without me or your right wing source and it clearly states:

The First Amendment "..."expressly prohibits the United States Congress from making laws "respecting an establishment of religion" or that prohibit the free exercise of religion,..."

So it keeps the government from interfering in religion - period. It says people can't force others to establish a religion and be a part of it and at the same time, it says that the government cannot interfere with people worshipping any religion. Clearly the intent is to provide that the government and people's religion should be separate.

I'll say it again. The First Amendment, whose purpose was to protect religion from government interference, has been "interrupted" to mean almost exactly the opposite! Now, according to the "majority" on the Supreme Court, government must be protected from religion, a view that is contrary to what the First Amendment declares and to what the Founding fathers intended.

We (the government)don't and never have needed to be protected from Christianity. belief in God and his word does no harm. It protects us by laying down the laws as God deemed fit for us. This country was formed on that faith. It was the church that needed to protect itself from government interference. That was why the fonding fathers wrote the first amendment. They never intended for the government to kick out or get rid of God's good book and our abiding by it.

Like I said the people in this nation are calling what is right, wrong and what is wrong, right. They have it backwards. God will not continue to bless this Nation if we don't change and repent.

So it keeps the government from interfering in religion - period.

You said it.

Yet the gov. continues to interfere by trying to make laws that go against what God deems 'right'. The gov. wants to allow gay people to marry, they should not be interfering in that. God said no already. The gov. allows abortions , and they shouldn't be interfering in that. God said no to that also. The gov. wants to keep the 10 commandments out of its buildings. They should not be interfering in our christian nation. The first amendment was written to protect the church from gov. interference. Not the opposite as you and others seem to believe.

When they say church and state they don't just refer to Christian churches...all beliefs should be protected!!!!

rodriguez is right!

What the founding fathers wanted to ensure is simply that the government doesn't interfere with people's right to worship anyway they see fit and that the church does not interfere with the running of the government.

I'll say it again too: that is the reason why separation of church and state is so important. Don't you understand that if you allow one church to make laws, then at some point in time if a different church becomes more popular, let's say Catholicism, you would be outraged if the Pope was involved in making our laws strictly according to Catholic doctrine.

One religion, Christianity, does not rule this country. We are a country of laws that protect the right of every citizen to worship any religion they choose without censorship from the government. It is discriminatory for Christians to demand that laws governing all American citizens should be based solely on the Christian doctrine and that is in large part why the First Amendment was written and adopted.

You seem to have a very convoluted way of thinking about the First Amendment, patty. I understand your reasoning, but it is wrong.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.