Hello!
My scale died recently and I bought the WW Wi-Fi scale and I hate it. I feel like it bounces around a lot and it doesn’t sync directly with my iPhone health app. I have to connect to the scale every time I use it or my weight isn’t recorded.

Do you have a digital scale that you can use an iPhone with that you love? Preferably one that tells you body fat and such?

Have you used the Aria? Was it good?

Thanks everyone!

Ash replied to my post (nicely). You replied to her reply to me: "That's exactly my rebuttal, it's to track trends."

It looked like you were saying "My rebuttal to Cranky is exactly the same as yours is." It felt personal, especially after you implied I didn't know how to use my own scale. (Which, OK, I'll acknowledge I'm primed to experience men-explaining-technology-unnecessarily with a bit more frustration than the average person, because I know more about technology than most men I encounter, and most men explain it to me anyway--not saying I know more about Arias than you do, but there's no evidence I know less, either; yet, you explained it to me. That may have colored how I read your second post, but maybe not. After all, it didn't have anything marking it as a general comment--something like "that's exactly my rebuttal when the accuracy of the individual measurements comes up," for instance, or simply, "I agree; I use it for trends." "Rebuttal" is an arguing word, as I said before, and when using an arguing word on a text-only medium, some extra clarification is helpful.)

Edited September 12, 20187 yr by CrankyMagpie

1 hour ago, CrankyMagpie said:

Ash replied to my post (nicely). You replied to her reply to me: "That's exactly my rebuttal, it's to track trends."

It looked like you were saying "My rebuttal to Cranky is exactly the same as yours is." It felt personal, especially after you implied I didn't know how to use my own scale. (Which, OK, I'll acknowledge I'm primed to experience men-explaining-technology-unnecessarily with a bit more frustration than the average person, because I know more about technology than most men I encounter, and most men explain it to me anyway--not saying I know more about Arias than you do, but there's no evidence I know less, either; yet, you explained it to me. That may have colored how I read your second post, but maybe not. After all, it didn't have anything marking it as a general comment--something like "that's exactly my rebuttal when the accuracy of the individual measurements comes up," for instance, or simply, "I agree; I use it for trends." "Rebuttal" is an arguing word, as I said before, and when using an arguing word on a text-only medium, some extra clarification is helpful.)

Might help to note that I don't write with emotion implied, part of the "spectrum" stuff. Try not to read my text with any added emotion, for the most part... there is no emotion or hidden meaning in my text. My posts are exactly as they are, nothing extra or hidden.

@AshAsh1 and a bunch of others can attest.

I also don't assume anything, I provide facts and figures where possible, if it's something I'm writing that is personally something I've experienced, that's as far as it goes. I don't typically speak for someone else's experience.

Edited September 12, 20187 yr by Matt Z

19 minutes ago, Matt Z said:

@AshAsh1 and a bunch of others can attest.

I can attest.