Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BariatricPal

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Join BariatricPal free

  • Ask your own questions
  • Reply and follow topics
  • Message other members
  • No cost, no spam

43% Pay NO Federal Income Tax - ARE YOU KIDDING ME??

[emphasis added by OP]

The Income Tax System is Broken

43 Percent Of Americans Pay No Federal Income Tax, A Sign That Something's Wrong, Writes Declan McCullagh

April 15, 2009 | by Declan McCullagh

(CBS) On April 15, don't be surprised if the line at your local post office is a bit shorter than usual. That's because your neighbors may not be paying any income taxes this year.

An astonishing 43.4 percent of Americans now pay zero or negative federal income taxes. The number of single or jointly-filing "taxpayers" - the word must be applied sparingly - who pay no taxes or receive government handouts has reached 65.6 million, out of a total of 151 million.

Those numbers come from an analysis published yesterday by the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. Neither is a low-tax or conservative advocacy group; the Urban Institute was created under the Johnson administration during the Great Society era, and it receives most of its funding from the federal government.

"You've got a larger and larger share of people paying less and less for the services provided by the federal government," says Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center. "The concern is that the majority can say, 'Let's have more benefits, spend more,' if they're not paying for it. It's 'free.' That's not a good thing to have."

By historic standards, today's situation is an aberration. Between 1950 and 1990, the number of owe-no-money federal tax returns averaged 21 percent, dipping to 18 percent in 1986, according to Tax Foundation data. In the 1990s, the owe-no-money percentage hovered around 25 percent of taxpayers.

But then politicians began another round of tinkering with the tax code, adding reams of new pages to an already incomprehensible set of rules that even the guy overseeing the IRS can't seem to figure out.

Democrats wanted to lower taxes on the least affluent, while Republicans wanted to lower taxes on everyone. The result was bipartisan enthusiasm for tax credits aimed at everything from children (1997) and college students (1997) to hybrid cars (2005) and homebuyers (2009). Many of these credits dole out cash to people even if they report no income, making them mere government handouts.

"There's no difference at all in terms of the effects on the federal deficit," says Williams of the Tax Policy Center. "It's perfectly equivalent. It's just easier to say, 'I cut your taxes' as opposed to 'I created a new federal program to send money to people.'"

I'm talking here about federal income taxes, not other taxes like Social Security, Medicare, state income taxes, sales taxes, or car registration taxes, some of which are extracted through payroll deductions. The owe-no-money crowd tends to get hit by at least some of those.

The perils of today's situation should be obvious. The United States is close to a tipping point - where most people can skip the post office run on April 15 to mail a check because they're expecting one from the government instead.

"It is somewhat odd that you have a decreasing number of folks paying into the federal income tax system, a decreasing number of folks who have a stake in what the government pays for," says Matt Moon of the non-partisan Tax Foundation in Washington, D.C.

It then becomes tempting to vote for politicians promising more and more handouts, paid for by money forcibly extracted from an ever-shrinking number of their neighbors. In addition to being immoral, it's poor public policy: people who pay no taxes but nevertheless get benefits are less likely to be careful overseers of their elected representatives.

"At some point people become less and less invested in making sure their government is accountable and frugal," says Peter Sepp, vice president for policy and communications at the National Taxpayers Union, a lower-tax advocacy group. "If you pay very little for getting all kinds of government benefits, you might view those programs as a bargain, even though they may waste tens of billions of dollars a year."

As a candidate, President Obama promised still more tax credits, including ones aimed at child care, "clean cars," and savings accounts. As the Wall Street Journal explained at the time: "You can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer - a federal check - from taxpayers to nontaxpayers. Once upon a time we called this 'welfare,' or in George McGovern's 1972 campaign a 'Demogrant.'"

A recession, the stimulus, and innumerable bailouts have placed Mr. Obama's plans on hold. But the expiration of the Bush tax cuts at midnight on December 31, 2010 will renew interest in a tax law rewrite.

That will be an opportunity to gut the current system and replace it with something simpler and fairer. After all, if government is important enough to force most of us to work until April 13 to pay its bills, why shouldn't everyone share the pain?

Declan McCullagh is the chief political correspondent for CNET and a CBS News EconWatch contributor. Previously, he was Wired's Washington bureau chief and a reporter for Time.com and Time magazine in Washington, D.C. He has taught journalism, public policy, and First Amendment law. He is an occasional programmer, avid analog and digital photographer, and lives with his wife in the San Francisco Bay area.

By Delcan McCullagh

© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Replies 190
  • Views 12.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Featured Replies

Fox keeps tossing itself out there. And it is quite amusing when you defend Fox by saying that ALL THE OTHERS are left wing numb(?) nuts. Who's delusional? Not you! Noooooo. EVERYBODY in the media but Fox is extreme. ALL the others except Fox. Nobody but Fox gives the straight skinny. Only Fox reports the truth. EVERYBODY else in the whole world doesn't give truthful accountings of the news. Not ABC, not NBC, not CBS, not CNN, not MSNBC, not the BBC - no one but Fox gets it right. And you mean WAAAAYYY right, eh?

Well if you don't watch it, how the hell do you know? And if you don't watch the others on a regular basis, how the hell would you know? You divine the answers?

Cool trick. Why don't you share your secret to gleaning the pure truth from the media? I'm sure everyone would love to be enlightened. I know I sure would. You must be an amazing brainiac. I will sit at my computer in anticipation of having your brilliant insight and wisdom to expose the awesome truth in the public media that only your mind is able to reveal.

Just checking in. I'll be happy to debate if anybody wants to look @ facts (as opposed to general statements about how Fox news is slowly rewriting history in this country).

Just checking in. I'll be happy to debate if anybody wants to look @ facts (as opposed to general statements about how Fox news is slowly rewriting history in this country).

Hehe, yeah, that's pretty much why I've abandoned this thread as well. :unsure:

Anybody watching Glenn Beck and the ACORN drama?? Wow.

I guess you like to pick on your butt boils as much as you do me.

Glenn Beck - what a notion. You all just think of me as your resident Glenn Beck. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Glenn Beck is a commentator - not a newscaster - not anything else but a commontater. That's what he claims to be. Just someone who is willing to put his ideas out there. He definitely don't need no stinking research or facts and he ain't even guaranteeing that what he says is even true.

All agreed that I'm your equivalent of Glenn Beck? If so, I'm sure I'll feel the love all the way to my little office. Suweet!

I guess you like to pick on your butt boils as much as you do me.

You sure do hiss and spit more than my butt boils, dat's fo sho! :cursing:

Glenn Beck - what a notion. You all just think of me as your resident Glenn Beck. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Just can't do it. He's funny, entertaining, and, oh yeah, intelligent. :cursing:

Well because he shares your take on politics, etc., you've decided he's intelligent? Right, sure, I get that.

And you know for a fact that I'm not intelligent, eh? Well you can't blame a girl for trying. Boo hoo. I sure wish I was as smart as Beth. And as funny! I could get some stand up comic work. :cursing:

Well because he shares your take on politics, etc., you've decided he's intelligent? Right, sure, I get that.

And you know for a fact that I'm not intelligent, eh? Well you can't blame a girl for trying. Boo hoo. I sure wish I was as smart as Beth. And as funny! I could get some stand up comic work. :cursing:

So those who share your take on politics are stupid? Good, then we agree! :cursing:

And comedy? Yeah, not so much. :cursing:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.