Mississippi Republican presents bill to make it illegal to feed obese people

[miztrniceguy 1]

if this was to pass, then i would recommend legilation to prevent alcoholics from being served drinks in a bar or restaurant...same difference, different addiction

[green 6]

if this was to pass, then i would recommend legilation to prevent alcoholics from being served drinks in a bar or restaurant...same difference, different addiction

A good idea. Afterall, they have already banned smokers from smoking.

[neveragain 9]

Some things that happen in this world SHOCK me...

[kagoscuba 0]

"if this was to pass, then i would recommend legilation to prevent alcoholics from being served drinks in a bar or restaurant...same difference, different addiction"

Um, this already exists. Not for alcoholics, but it is illegal in many states for a bar to serve drinks to someone who is obviously impaired.

I'm actually not that upset by the "turning away the obese" legislation. From a personal freedom standpoint, yeah, it is facist. However, of all people, we should know the benefit of having a temptation removed. the band doesn't work for me because of some magic. It works for me because the food that caused me problems in the past - Pasta and bread - I am physically incapable of eatnig now. There is no temptation and I don't feel deprived, because I know it is impossible for me to eat those things. If I knew it was impossible for me to go into a Mickey D's, then I wouldn't miss that either. That's the difference between dieting and the band. You can always slide on a diet. You really can't on the band, unless you gorge on ice cream or high-calorie drinks. I didn't have an issue with those before the band, so maybe that part is naturally easy for me.

[miztrniceguy 1]

i'm not talking about drunks...i mean no alcohol at all

[kagoscuba 0]

My point was, if a bar can refuse to serve drinks to someone who is obviously impaired (they didn't have to drink there; they could have come to the bar drunk already...happens all the time), then why is it such a stretch of the imagination for a restaurant to refuse to serve food to someone who is obviously well fed already? I understand the logic, even though I don't condone it. Even another example is the fact casinos can and do refuse to allow addicted gamblers into their casinos, once they are put on the "do not allow" list.

[hopeinapril 1]

This is just obnoxious. I mean, really, we live in the USA or at least most of us do. I don't want to live in a socialized state. If you want that crap then go to one of those countries. The USA was based on personal freedom. The government keeps picking away at our rights. Pretty soon they will be in our homes, bedrooms, bathrooms, etc. What a nightmare!

I don't want the government in my life and I don't need their help. Frankly, just leave me the heck alone!

[ELENATION 0]

"if this was to pass, then i would recommend legilation to prevent alcoholics from being served drinks in a bar or restaurant...same difference, different addiction"

Um, this already exists. Not for alcoholics, but it is illegal in many states for a bar to serve drinks to someone who is obviously impaired.

I'm actually not that upset by the "turning away the obese" legislation. From a personal freedom standpoint, yeah, it is facist. However, of all people, we should know the benefit of having a temptation removed. the band doesn't work for me because of some magic. It works for me because the food that caused me problems in the past - Pasta and bread - I am physically incapable of eatnig now. There is no temptation and I don't feel deprived, because I know it is impossible for me to eat those things. If I knew it was impossible for me to go into a Mickey D's, then I wouldn't miss that either. That's the difference between dieting and the band. You can always slide on a diet. You really can't on the band, unless you gorge on ice cream or high-calorie drinks. I didn't have an issue with those before the band, so maybe that part is naturally easy for me.

The slight difference is that you and only you decided to put the band around your stomach to help yourself lose weight, the government didn't make you, or a bill or anybody else for that matter, if I'm not mistaken, I think you have stated to be pro-choice... because it should be the woman's right... (disregard this comment if I'm wrong, please.. )but how is it ok for someone to want to protect a woman's right to do whatever they want with their bodies, beause it's their bodies.....(which I respect your view, even if I disagree...)but it's ok for that same person to understand restriction on the amount of food that someone wants to eat.... hey, it's their bodies as well....makes no sense to me..:eek:...

[kagoscuba 0]

True, I am pro-choice, and also I was trying to be the "devil's advocate" on the whole banning of obese people suggestion. I did call it facist and I did not condone the suggestion; however, I do understand it. On a weird level it does make sense, but implementation of it would have to be balanced with civil liberties, which would mean it would and SHOULD fail. People who have never been fat probably don't see the harm in such legislation. A lot of them just think, "eat less, you lazy ba$tards, and we'll welcome you in no problem." Of course we all know it is not that easy.

[*susan* 1,709]

It is a pretty ridiculous idea. I don't see how it can compare to refusing to sell alcohol to someone who is intoxicated or banning smoking. Smoking is not a life-sustaining need. Drinking is not a life-sustaining need. Eating is a life-sustaining need.

If I were a smoker and smoked around others, I could cause them health problems due to second-hand smoke. If I were a drinker, I could seriously harm or kill someone by driving drunk. If I go to a restaurant and overeat, the only person I am hurting is myself.

I just don't see the comparisons.

[Chris_NJ 9]

Where was this 150 lbs ago? Would have saved me some money and surgery.

[Nologoz 18]

Where was this 150 lbs ago? Would have saved me some money and surgery.

Great post....too funny!

I think I'd have ended up turning to the black market to get my fix.

Of course, starting an enterprise in the new underground economy would be tempting too....think of the money to be made...

[green 6]

Yep, I can see it now. Fat folk sending skinny minnies into MacDonalds with cash in order to buy 'em their fix of Big Macs. Parents sending in their little kids....

"Please, honey, do it for daddy.... Get daddy his burger and fries. I'll buy you a new toy...."

[RachelMcD 0]

That's insanity. It just sheds light on the discrimination against heavy people. I feel it and have felt it like most of you have in your lives. What's next? Do they force us into concentration camps to get thin? feed us with slingshots through a chain link fence? And knowing the nature of our society it won't end there, once you can discriminate against a body type you open a floodgate of possible discriminations. "sorry, you are too ugly to shop in our store, you are making our beautiful customers feel uncomfortable" sorry, but that irritates me:cursing:

Discriminating against body type and etc. is already happening. Just a few months ago I had someone tell me they were told they could not even enter a shoe store because her feet were too fat and other customers would be uncomfortable. It happens.

[NukeChik 1]

Discriminating against body type and etc. is already happening. Just a few months ago I had someone tell me they were told they could not even enter a shoe store because her feet were too fat and other customers would be uncomfortable. It happens.

I probably would have been arrested after sticking my fat foot up someones skinny a$$