Jump to content
×
Are you looking for the BariatricPal Store? Go now!

Recommended Posts

Here is a link that can help you set your target goal weight.

http://www.halls.md/ideal-weight/body.htm

This site also has a link about the Metropolitan Life Insurance weight tables, and why that reference may not be the appropriate weight target for individuals. I had never seen the study / charts it references. Interesting stuff - but I happen to like statistics.

I am 11 pounds away from my original target, and am trying to decide where I want to stop - so I am revisiting this whole topic again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know I never really considered what my goal weight should be. I am three months out and only about halfway, so I'm definitely not pressed for time. When I made my ticker I looked at the BMI charts and it said a healthy weight was between 98 and 130... so I went in the middle with 115. But honestly I have no burning desire to hit that number. I have no clue where I want to end up because I have never been there before. I am hoping I am one of those people who just "know" when they've reached their ideal weight, but of course nothing is that easy right??

Thanks for posting this! Hopefully when I am at that point I'll be able to look back and use this to help me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is interesting... my recommended weight on the above link is 134lb (approx 9 1/2stone), now, I haven't been that weight since I was 15 and that was 25 years ago. My surgeon's goal is 154lb (11stone) so that is a 20lb difference... to me, that is a big difference! My ultimate goal of 140-138 is the approx weight I carried in my late teens and early twenties... now I really don't think I will get there... I will try, but I won't beat myself up if I don't. To weight anything under 11 stone would be amazing for me!!

Time will tell my sleeve friends...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love this topic... LOL ;) Ok most of you know that's a lie.

Anyway, I just wanted to say that I think the REAL answer is as individual as all the snowflakes that fall from the sky in the Winter. I think the real answer to how much each of us should weight would be for each individual have their body fat % checked. Depending on how much body fat you want to have, you would have your lean body mass weighed. Then you would multiply 1.## to get your answer.

It's still not THAT simple either. If you are anything like me, being super obese for decades, you have to consider other factors... such as how much does my extra skin weigh? How much residual fat will I have left over? Being obese our fat cells do multiply, yet they never fully disappear. Thus me needing to have my procedure to have it removed.

Good luck to all finding the true answer - which for me has just been accepting me as I am. ;) I'm healthy, fit and feel good in my clothing size. That's where I've chosen to end up anyhow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also did not know what to choose as a goal weight. I have been overweight for long, all I remember is my lowest weight while dieting. That was 182#. I remember feeling really good about the way I looked then and that was only 53# from my preop weight and only 22# from my weight right now. Wow! That thought just blew my mind! On my surgery day my surgeon asked me how much I would like to lose. I told him at least 55#. His eyes nearly popped out of his head and said I will likely lose 80-90#. So I decided to set my goal at a 90# loss. However, if I don't get there I know I will be happy because I've only lost 31# so far and I already feel great relief of my back and joints. Overall, this proves to me that my goal should be based on how I feel at the time. I will know it when I get there.

Big hugs!

Lisa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have no real idea of a "goal" weight--my surgeon didn't set one, and my nutritionist set my goal at 212 pounds (which was almost 10 pounds ago). I'm 6'2" and have been overweight for around 25 years. I feel both a little bit lost and a little loathe to actually set a goal that may or may not be attainable--does that make sense? I know I want to reach a "normal" BMI of 25, which means that for my height, I need to hit 194 pounds, but that's the top range of "normal" for my height. I don't think I have a particularly large frame--I mean, I have a LONG frame, but it's not like I have thick bones or am what someone would consider "big boned."

So those charts say that the "people's choice" weight for my height is 178. Wow. I have a LONG way to go to hit that weight. It's frustrating that there's a 30- to 40-pound range in "normal" weight (from 155-195 for my height!) on some weight charts, which makes those charts sort of useless.

I know that finding an ideal weight is very individualized, and I agree that aiming just for a number isn't really a useful thing--some bodies are just more muscular and will be heavier for height and yet still really healthy and in shape (and as Irene proves, smaller in size than one might expect at a particular weight). I don't really have a "muscular" build, either...

So I'm joining the "I have no idea where I'm heading" club, and I feel kind of okay about that, as long as I make it into "normal" BMI land (which is, right now, my "goal"). I'm looking forward to onederland some time soon (only have 4 pounds to go!) and then to 194 (normal BMI) and to 190 (my original "goal"). After that, I am clueless. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My goal have been based upon body composition, aiming for a nominal 15% body fat (which is low/mid range of the normal or "fitness" range, depending upon whose charts one is using) for men; realistically, given the flakiness of body fat measurements, and the effect of the residual excess skin, anything in the mid-teens is a healthy range. My personal trainer thinks that the upper teens where I am now is low enough; anything in this range is plenty healthy, but still a few points "overweight" on BMI and still above the various averages noted on the site linked by the OP, but that shows the difference between what's healthy and appropriate for an individual versus the averages.

At two pounds above my nominal weight goal and upper teens on body fat, I'm now into maintenance transition mode and will see how things settle out as I arrest the weight loss and let my body comp adjust and stabilize - maybe allow a bit more loss and/or work to build back a bit of muscle mass, but we're talking about a couple pounds here or there at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone asked my doctor about ideal weights at support group a while back. He said be careful using ideal weights. Many people who have been overweight for many years have developed sturdy bones and targeting for example a weight from the actuarial charts could be too low. Like way too low 20-30 pounds. Depends on the individual I guess. I will have a lot of loose skin plus I have swelling in one of my legs from lymphedema so I tacked on some pounds to my ideal weight. He said a lot of people will recognize it when they get there not before. Unfortunately I'm not close enough yet to test thst assertion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone asked my doctor about ideal weights at support group a while back. He said be careful using ideal weights. Many people who have been overweight for many years have developed sturdy bones and targeting for example a weight from the actuarial charts could be too low. Like way too low 20-30 pounds. Depends on the individual I guess. I will have a lot of loose skin plus I have swelling in one of my legs from lymphedema so I tacked on some pounds to my ideal weight. He said a lot of people will recognize it when they get there not before. Unfortunately I'm not close enough yet to test thst assertion.

ITA Rose, it's absolutely true. IMO, anyone who was carrying well over 100+ Lbs over their ideal weight for a long time will end up with the "sturdy bones", lots of heavy excess skin, extra fat cells, etc... etc... I think we need to be fair with ourselves on not beat ourselves up if we don't hit our "weight" goals based on normal persons standards. For me, I'm not normal when it comes to that. And I'm okay with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I hit 140 and size 8's, I thought if I didn't lose any more, I was happy and my surgery successful. Now I am at 130 and size 6's, I'm ecstatic! And the weight is still coming off. My lowest adult weight was 122-125. I guess I'll aim for there now? I am 4 months out, and still have significant restriction, so should I go as low as I can while I can? ( still staying in BMI range for my height of course, I'm 5' 4") or at 44, should I have a little fat to plump out the wrinkles? Lol. Never, never did I think I would be worried about losing too much for my frame!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Trending Products

  • Trending Topics

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Stone Art By SKL

      Decorative Wall Cladding & Panels | Stone Art By SKL
      Elevate your space with Stone Art By SKL's decorative wall claddings & panels. Explore premium designs for timeless elegance.
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • Clueless_girl

      Losing my hair in clumps and still dealing with "stomach" issues from gallbladder removal surgery. On the positive side I'm doing better about meeting protein and water goals and taking my vitamins, so yay? 🤷‍♀️
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • BeanitoDiego

      I've hit a stall 9 months out. I'm not worried, though. My fitness levels continue to improve and I have nearly accomplished my pre-surgery goal of learning to scuba dive! One dive left to complete to get my PADI card 🐠
      I was able to go for a 10K/6mile hike in the mountains two days ago just for the fun of it. In the before days, I might have attempted this, but it would have taken me 7 or 8 hours to complete and I would have been exhausted and in pain for the next two days. Taking my time with breaks for snacks and water, I was finished with my wee jaunt in only 4 hours 😎 and really got to enjoy photographing some insects, fungi, and turtles.
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • Mr.Kantos

      Just signed up. Feeling optimistic.
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • Frugal

      Welcome to Frugal Testing, where we are committed to revolutionizing the software testing landscape with our efficient and affordable solutions. As a pioneering company in this field, we understand the challenges faced by startups, small to medium-sized businesses and any organization working without budget constraints. Our mission is to deliver top-notch testing services that ensure the highest quality of software, all while keeping your costs in check.
      Frugal Testing offers a comprehensive suite of testing services tailored to meet diverse needs. Specializing in different types of testing including functional testing, automation testing, metaverse testing and D365 testing, we cover all bases to guarantee thorough software quality assurance. Our approach is not just about identifying bugs; it's about ensuring a seamless and superior user experience.
      Innovation is at the heart of what we do. By integrating the latest tools and technologies, many of which are cutting-edge open source solutions, we stay ahead in delivering efficient and effective testing services. This approach allows us to provide exceptional quality testing without the high costs typically associated with advanced testing methodologies.
      Understanding each client's unique needs is fundamental to our service delivery. At Frugal Testing, the focus is on creating customized testing strategies that align with specific business goals and budget requirements. This client-centric approach ensures that every testing solution is not only effective but also fully aligned with the client's objectives.
      Our team is our greatest asset. Composed of skilled professionals who are experts in the latest testing techniques and technologies, they bring dedication, expertise and a commitment to excellence in every project. This expertise ensures that our client’s software not only meets but often exceeds the highest standards of quality and performance.
      Frugal Testing is more than just a service provider; we are a partner in your success. With a blend of quality, innovation and cost-effectiveness, we are here to help you navigate the complexities of software testing, ensuring your product stands out in today's competitive market. 
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
  • Recent Topics

  • Hot Products

  • Sign Up For
    Our Newsletter

    Follow us for the latest news
    and special product offers!
  • Together, we have lost...
      lbs

    PatchAid Vitamin Patches

    ×