Jump to content
×
Are you looking for the BariatricPal Store? Go now!

Science 101



Recommended Posts

A unit of measurement is constant. An inch is always an inch - it does not matter whether it is measured in 1/8ths, 1/16ths, or by the width of elastic bands...an inch is always an inch. (although measurements by men may vary...:tongue2:) This is also true in the measurement of weight.

What does this have to do with anything? If I read one more time that a pound of fat weighs less than a pound of muscle, I think my eyes will start to bleed, and steam pour out of my ears!!! A pound = a pound. The space they occupy will be different (for example, your waist may be smaller but your total weight the same), but the weight will be constant.

A ton of feathers is the same weight as a ton of gold coins...but the amount of space required to achieve that weight will be significantly different.

OK. Class dismissed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I lose a pound of fat, but gain a ton of gold coins? Then, can I say whatever the hell I want to say...because, well - I have a ton of gold.

Kinda like Oprah.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I lose a pound of fat, but gain a ton of gold coins? Then, can I say whatever the hell I want to say...because, well - I have a ton of gold.

Yes indeedy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what you are saying is if I loose a pound of fat and gain a pound of muscle my pants will be loser? :tongue2:

Just maybe...depends on where the fat was!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just maybe...depends on where the fat was!

Doh...mine's in my head - guess my pants won't fit smaller afterall.

Okay...I'm definitely silly today.

Back to OP - It is annoying to hear that a pound of something doesn't equal a pound of something else. Sometimes I wonder if people can hear themselves speak? Or if they can, are they playing some sick practical joke on the people listening and nodding? "Oohh....did you hear what he said? A pound of fat is lighter than a pound of muscle. Wow. FASCINATING." Really? Who buys that crap?

I've explainded that theory to my daughter, and I try to say a spoonful of fat vs. a spoonful of muscle. That way it is still a visual, but doesn't defy science 101. :tongue2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I lose a pound of fat, but gain a ton of gold coins? Then, can I say whatever the hell I want to say...because, well - I have a ton of gold.

Kinda like Oprah.

Except I think Oprah would be gaining a pound of fat these days.

I've explainded that theory to my daughter, and I try to say a spoonful of fat vs. a spoonful of muscle.

What theory? A spoonful of muscle does weigh more than a spoonful of fat.

You people are confusing me!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is time to go back to science 101 literally.

A pound of muscle weighs the same as a pound of fat (weight)

A pound of muscle takes up less space than a pound of fat (volume)

Just like a cup of lead weighs more than a cup of feathers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used that story back in 6th grade, and 2 of the smart boys in class (I was always in competition with them) did not understand the concept. I can still remember them arguing.

I said, what weighs more.. a pound of feathers or a pound of bricks. They were adament that it was bricks. I even explained how a POUND is a POUND, and they disagreed because bricks are heavier. I never felt like I was in competition with them again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used that story back in 6th grade, and 2 of the smart boys in class (I was always in competition with them) did not understand the concept. I can still remember them arguing.

I said, what weighs more.. a pound of feathers or a pound of bricks. They were adament that it was bricks. I even explained how a POUND is a POUND, and they disagreed because bricks are heavier.

FF - I think those 2 boys work with me!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What theory? A spoonful of muscle does weigh more than a spoonful of fat.

You people are confusing me!!

:biggrin: Sorry...! I guess I'm not all that clear sometimes - and not very accurate when throwing around scientific terms. Theory s/b replaced with something else, I guess.

I meant, when I was explaining to DD about a specific amount of fat being lighter than the same specific amount of muscle. Like a tsp, or a cup vs. a measurment of weight. I don't say pound to pound, fat is lighter, cause that's stupid and wrong. :D I say tsp vs tsp, fat is lighter than muscle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A unit of measurement is constant. An inch is always an inch - it does not matter whether it is measured in 1/8ths, 1/16ths, or by the width of elastic bands...an inch is always an inch. (although measurements by men may vary...:thumbup:) This is also true in the measurement of weight.

What does this have to do with anything? If I read one more time that a pound of fat weighs less than a pound of muscle, I think my eyes will start to bleed, and steam pour out of my ears!!! A pound = a pound. The space they occupy will be different (for example, your waist may be smaller but your total weight the same), but the weight will be constant.

A ton of feathers is the same weight as a ton of gold coins...but the amount of space required to achieve that weight will be significantly different.

OK. Class dismissed.

Ahhh! But......a ton of feathers does not weigh the same as a ton of gold. There's some weird weight scale pertaining to gold (and some other precious metals) that is different than our standard system of weights, even though the jargon is the same. That makes comparing anything with gold a "trick question" weightwise. Confused? me too. I'll look for a link.

Edited by plain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh! But......a ton of feathers does not weigh the same as a ton of gold. There's some weird weight scale pertaining to gold (and some other precious metals) that is different than our standard system of weights, even though the jargon is the same. That makes comparing anything with gold a "trick question" weightwise. Confused? me too. I'll look for a link.

Ok, I found it....Click the link only if you're geeky like me and want to know why a pond of feathers is not equal to a pound of gold.

Troy weight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Trending Products

  • Trending Topics

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Clueless_girl

      Losing my hair in clumps and still dealing with "stomach" issues from gallbladder removal surgery. On the positive side I'm doing better about meeting protein and water goals and taking my vitamins, so yay? 🤷‍♀️
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • BeanitoDiego

      I've hit a stall 9 months out. I'm not worried, though. My fitness levels continue to improve and I have nearly accomplished my pre-surgery goal of learning to scuba dive! One dive left to complete to get my PADI card 🐠
      I was able to go for a 10K/6mile hike in the mountains two days ago just for the fun of it. In the before days, I might have attempted this, but it would have taken me 7 or 8 hours to complete and I would have been exhausted and in pain for the next two days. Taking my time with breaks for snacks and water, I was finished with my wee jaunt in only 4 hours 😎 and really got to enjoy photographing some insects, fungi, and turtles.
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • Mr.Kantos

      Just signed up. Feeling optimistic.
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • Frugal

      Welcome to Frugal Testing, where we are committed to revolutionizing the software testing landscape with our efficient and affordable solutions. As a pioneering company in this field, we understand the challenges faced by startups, small to medium-sized businesses and any organization working without budget constraints. Our mission is to deliver top-notch testing services that ensure the highest quality of software, all while keeping your costs in check.
      Frugal Testing offers a comprehensive suite of testing services tailored to meet diverse needs. Specializing in different types of testing including functional testing, automation testing, metaverse testing and D365 testing, we cover all bases to guarantee thorough software quality assurance. Our approach is not just about identifying bugs; it's about ensuring a seamless and superior user experience.
      Innovation is at the heart of what we do. By integrating the latest tools and technologies, many of which are cutting-edge open source solutions, we stay ahead in delivering efficient and effective testing services. This approach allows us to provide exceptional quality testing without the high costs typically associated with advanced testing methodologies.
      Understanding each client's unique needs is fundamental to our service delivery. At Frugal Testing, the focus is on creating customized testing strategies that align with specific business goals and budget requirements. This client-centric approach ensures that every testing solution is not only effective but also fully aligned with the client's objectives.
      Our team is our greatest asset. Composed of skilled professionals who are experts in the latest testing techniques and technologies, they bring dedication, expertise and a commitment to excellence in every project. This expertise ensures that our client’s software not only meets but often exceeds the highest standards of quality and performance.
      Frugal Testing is more than just a service provider; we are a partner in your success. With a blend of quality, innovation and cost-effectiveness, we are here to help you navigate the complexities of software testing, ensuring your product stands out in today's competitive market. 
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • ChunkCat

      I have no clue where to upload this, so I'll put it here. This is pre-op vs the morning of my 6 month appointment! In office I weight 232, that's 88 lbs down since my highest weight, 75 lbs since my surgery weight! I can't believe this jacket fit... I am smaller now than the last time I was this size which the surgeon found really amusing. He's happy with where I am in my weight loss and estimates I'll be around 200 lbs by my 1 year anniversary! My lowest weight as an adult is 195, so that's pretty damn exciting to think I'll be near that at a year. Everything from there will be unknown territory!!

      · 3 replies
      1. AmberFL

        You look amazing!!! 😻 you have been killing it!

      2. NickelChip

        Congratulations! You're making excellent progress and looking amazing!

      3. BabySpoons

        So proud of you Cat. Getting into those smaller size clothes is half the fun isn't it?. Keep up the good work!!!!

  • Recent Topics

  • Hot Products

  • Sign Up For
    Our Newsletter

    Follow us for the latest news
    and special product offers!
  • Together, we have lost...
      lbs

    PatchAid Vitamin Patches

    ×