Jump to content
×
Are you looking for the BariatricPal Store? Go now!

Common channel



Recommended Posts

So, when I had my first follow up, my Dr and I talked about the common channel. Mine is approx 250cm. He said that there are opposing schools of thought on this, because my weight loss may be slower, and I will need to be more diligent to stop regain. But, that I should also have little to no diarrhea issues, and less malnutrition worries. He also pointed out that if need be, this can be altered in the future. Does anyone have a CC of this kind of length, long term

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My common channel is 150 cm long, but I really wish I had gone shorter to 100 cm because those patients who had a shorter channel lost quicker and more than I did, and they started out heavier than I was. With a BMI of 40 at the time of surgery, I was worried I would get too thin. Ha! No worries there. I've regained 4 pounds since my surgery two years ago.

Edited by Strivingforbetter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny that we were just talking about this last night at our meeting with Dr. Keshishian. While 100cm has been something of the standard for ages (this is with the "traditional" BPD/DS) the common channel is more variable these days, with 150-200 being sited more often. Dr. K's practice is, after measuring the entire small bowel, dividing it up by ratios between the alimentary and biliary limbs and the common channel, with ratios being somewhat variable depending upon a number of factors including age, gender, BMI, metabolic issues, diabetic issues. So guys, and taller ones at that, will tend to get longer CC's than shorter women, particularly if they are not diabetic or have other significant metabolic problems.

If you are talking about a SIPS/SADI/ "loop DS", from what I have seen, that does tend to run a longer CC - 2-300 cm - but it is still early on with that procedure so there are a lot more variables in how different docs perform it.

With you being of "moderate" weight by WLS standards (did you ever think that you would be "moderate"?) the less extreme approach has merit; it really comes down to your inclinations, as to how much of a "bigger hammer" than a basic VSG do you, personally, need? I started out a few pounds lighter than you and lost about 50 of it on myown when my wife went through her DS, and kept that off for several years until insurance started covering the VSG. With that history, I decided that the DS was overkill for me, though maybe a moderate amount of long term malabsorption would be useful in weight maintenance (so far, so good, though more fluctuations than I would like...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@CoramDeoMy DS was a long time ago and was 100cc. What your dr. said is basically true. Fewer possible gastro. and malabsorption issues. However, generally less and/or slower weight loss .

Edited by Postop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

I am at a BMI of 40 so I don’t need anything drastic but I don’t want the sleeve because of the potential regain. My surgeon said that he can do the SIPS for me with 350cm of bowel instead of 300. He said this should take away the risk of malnutrition and frequent bowel movement but still help with the regain issue. Any one here experience this or hear of this ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I caught a glimpse of my doctor's notes (I'm pre-op) and they said something would be 300cm, and the common channel would be 200cm. I have a 46.6 BMI, so not 50+, but not mild obesity either.

He also said he would make the common channel longer (200) because it's less malabsorption, and because I could expect less gastro issues. I'd expressed some worry about the social consequences of being gassy and smelly, so maybe that's why. Or maybe it's the new norm for DS. Or maybe it's because SADI isn't covered by my insurance, so I have to do classic DS... but milder. Not sure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I had the Sadi DS in Nov 2014 with a 40 bmi. My common channel is 300cm and I have no issues with malnutrition as long as I take Vitamins albeit less than a Hess DS patient (non-Sadi). The less is more theory has worked for me, meaning a longer common channel gave me 100% weight loss and kept it off while keeping me from being malnourished. I can eat a horse and not gain weight, although eating poorly will cause gas and bloating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Trending Products

  • Trending Topics

  • Recent Status Updates

    • BeanitoDiego

      I've hit a stall 9 months out. I'm not worried, though. My fitness levels continue to improve and I have nearly accomplished my pre-surgery goal of learning to scuba dive! One dive left to complete to get my PADI card 🐠
      I was able to go for a 10K/6mile hike in the mountains two days ago just for the fun of it. In the before days, I might have attempted this, but it would have taken me 7 or 8 hours to complete and I would have been exhausted and in pain for the next two days. Taking my time with breaks for snacks and water, I was finished with my wee jaunt in only 4 hours 😎 and really got to enjoy photographing some insects, fungi, and turtles.
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • Mr.Kantos

      Just signed up. Feeling optimistic.
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • Frugal

      Welcome to Frugal Testing, where we are committed to revolutionizing the software testing landscape with our efficient and affordable solutions. As a pioneering company in this field, we understand the challenges faced by startups, small to medium-sized businesses and any organization working without budget constraints. Our mission is to deliver top-notch testing services that ensure the highest quality of software, all while keeping your costs in check.
      Frugal Testing offers a comprehensive suite of testing services tailored to meet diverse needs. Specializing in different types of testing including functional testing, automation testing, metaverse testing and D365 testing, we cover all bases to guarantee thorough software quality assurance. Our approach is not just about identifying bugs; it's about ensuring a seamless and superior user experience.
      Innovation is at the heart of what we do. By integrating the latest tools and technologies, many of which are cutting-edge open source solutions, we stay ahead in delivering efficient and effective testing services. This approach allows us to provide exceptional quality testing without the high costs typically associated with advanced testing methodologies.
      Understanding each client's unique needs is fundamental to our service delivery. At Frugal Testing, the focus is on creating customized testing strategies that align with specific business goals and budget requirements. This client-centric approach ensures that every testing solution is not only effective but also fully aligned with the client's objectives.
      Our team is our greatest asset. Composed of skilled professionals who are experts in the latest testing techniques and technologies, they bring dedication, expertise and a commitment to excellence in every project. This expertise ensures that our client’s software not only meets but often exceeds the highest standards of quality and performance.
      Frugal Testing is more than just a service provider; we are a partner in your success. With a blend of quality, innovation and cost-effectiveness, we are here to help you navigate the complexities of software testing, ensuring your product stands out in today's competitive market. 
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • ChunkCat

      I have no clue where to upload this, so I'll put it here. This is pre-op vs the morning of my 6 month appointment! In office I weight 232, that's 88 lbs down since my highest weight, 75 lbs since my surgery weight! I can't believe this jacket fit... I am smaller now than the last time I was this size which the surgeon found really amusing. He's happy with where I am in my weight loss and estimates I'll be around 200 lbs by my 1 year anniversary! My lowest weight as an adult is 195, so that's pretty damn exciting to think I'll be near that at a year. Everything from there will be unknown territory!!

      · 3 replies
      1. AmberFL

        You look amazing!!! 😻 you have been killing it!

      2. NickelChip

        Congratulations! You're making excellent progress and looking amazing!

      3. BabySpoons

        So proud of you Cat. Getting into those smaller size clothes is half the fun isn't it?. Keep up the good work!!!!

    • BeanitoDiego

      I changed my profile image to a molecule of protein. Why? Because I am certain that it saved my life.
      · 1 reply
      1. BabySpoons

        That's brilliant! You've done amazing!! I should probably think about changing my profile picture at some point. Mine is the doll from Squid Games. Ironically the whole premise of the show is about dodging death. We've both done that...

  • Recent Topics

  • Hot Products

  • Sign Up For
    Our Newsletter

    Follow us for the latest news
    and special product offers!
  • Together, we have lost...
      lbs

    PatchAid Vitamin Patches

    ×