Jump to content
×
Are you looking for the BariatricPal Store? Go now!

tdslf1

LAP-BAND Patients
  • Content Count

    604
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About tdslf1

  • Rank
    Aspiring Evangelist
  • Birthday 11/18/1965
  1. tdslf1

    Saying Good-bye to all

    It's been nothing if not interesting. God speed.
  2. tdslf1

    Health Care

    Blumenthal, old news. Now we are onto that real joke in Illinois, Kirk, who had print, speeches and web ads stating he recieved honors that he didn't. Leave it to a Rethuglican to go all out pass the Demo to act a fool about his record. Both of them lied, but the rethug, reached a new low, he still won't take his bogus ads and print paper touting his false accomplishments down. He has been lying since day ONE about his service. Blumenthal, with his idiot self, let people define his record, then went along with it. This other yahoo made his up out of thin air.
  3. tdslf1

    Health Care

    Didn't the bulk of this garbage happen under Bush?
  4. tdslf1

    Bet you're sorry you voted for Obama now

    PG, I think you just intepreted what GOD said was free will to your will. I give up when you start speaking for God. God gave you his teachings in the bible according to you for all of us to follow. IF WE CHOSE TO FOLLOW. I choose for people to choose what direction they go into and you compare that to stoping them from making that choice? I am still lost on how you get to say no they can't have abortions if God is the judge and they have free will just like you do? If the free will statement is true, you can like it or not but trying to force your choice of NO onto them and God said that is not your role to do, but his? You say we are forcing our choice of choice on you? We don't care whether you have an abortion or not. We stand on both sides, have one or don't, you choose and have to face God. We don't make those judgements except for oursleves, not for other people. You however stand on the no choice side and thus take Gods role and try to force YOUR choice on them. They have the right to make that choice, God said that or not? Yet, your God gave us free will and you want to change that to suit your way of thinking. I thought there was a bowing to his wisdom and all that that you followed? Maybe you don't accept that God gave people free will. Maybe that is part of the bible you don't follow or accept?
  5. tdslf1

    Conservative VS Liberal

    Did any one hear the idiot Beck talk about the Obama girl on his radio? This waste of human is even lower than I thought. No one has ever heard Obama attack anyones children and yet, Bizerk thought it was ok to talk about the presidents kids? Just when I think he can't show himself to be a lower level of human, he proves me wrong. And yet he probably gets a pat on the back from his sub prime viewers.
  6. tdslf1

    Bet you're sorry you voted for Obama now

    BJ, Not trying to marginalize the crazies, just hate the argument and some of the crazy things the other side says as though because we believe in choice, we have less moral value than they do. Like they are closer to God than the rest of us because of their stand, BS. Trust me, I am diligent with this garbage, determined that this country will not turn in to a religious rule of morality.
  7. tdslf1

    Bet you're sorry you voted for Obama now

    I have no negative feeling towards Paul, he just feels the way he feels about business' regardless of how they treat humans in the process. I say he has less regard for people outside his family. The natural conclusion would be that SOme people would be told to go fly if they came to that place of business. The handicap, would be told to take a leap about getting to the 3rd floor. Blacks or hispanics, especially in AZ, would be told to frequent another facility to eat, and when that happened, we would have even more unrest in the country. I think this wasn't particularily a business law as it was a people law. Conditions that should be level for all people. If a business owner did not want to serve all people then don't go into business. This is settled law, no one is going to debate this, ever and for Paul to think this in 2010 america, says something about Paul and his motivations. Yes, it may be a leap to call him a racist, but I will say if he truely feels like that about business then he doesn't give a damn about others and how they get treated which is, for me, the Real difference between the dems and the rethugs. As stated, I am not calling him racist, but it sure plays into the tea bagger song of never having a problem spending under Bush, but now we have a problem mantra they have been spewing and the crazy signs with the N-word they carried at those tea parties. Every leader before us gets a pass about spending but this one doesn't? How crazy is that especially since he had to. All experts agree, we had to spend. This is fact. Then again, maybe we should have let it go down the tubes and many more would have been out of work, left homeless, unable to pay bills, short on police, short on the things our military needs to fight these wars. Not one person who says we should have not spent any money can tell us what the conclusion of doings so would bring. Please enlighten the crowd about what NOT spending any money would have brought us? How exactly would we be paying for things coming down the pike? What would be happening right now? Would we still have an economy that is getting better? Please tell the crowd and just saing stop the spending is not an answer, its a slogan, that doesn't work. Bring it to its natural conclusion because most don't think past their front lawn. Lets go further with it to progression. Also, which President did the turn around and stop the economy from falling off the cliff even further? Was it Obama? Was it Bush? For all the garbage being thrown at this president about his supposed lies, back peddling, he, according to my tally, did that ONE important thing. Stop the massive bleeding with his actions and NO ONE can say differently. All the ins and outs of who said what and who didn't do what, NO ONE can take that fact away, that he stopped one of the biggest economy failures in hstory. I'd like someone to explain differently, my recollection.
  8. tdslf1

    Conservative VS Liberal

    From Daily Kos website Stormfront.org, which was founded to support David Duke for senate by another KKK Grand Dragon, Don Black, has been promoting and contributing to Rand Paul's moneybombs. Palling around with WhiteSupremacists much? That's a tweet from Don Black, head of the white supremacist group Stormfront. Wow. ~snip~ So, Trey Grayson should reject donations from Republicans who voted for the bailout........but it's okay for Rand Paul to accept donations from Stormfront? genuineGOPmom.blogspot.com I will state this loudly and clearly. Over and over at the top of my Jewish lungs. Rand Paul MUST return Neo-Nazi funds NOW and DENOUNCE Stormfront.org But he can't. MinistryOfTruth's diary :: :: Democrats MUST turn 2010 into a referendum on Rand Paul. So, let's see how deep the rabbit hole goes. Paul Says Nazism’s Bad Because It’s Big Govt At a teabagger forum in March, Rand Paul was asked about claims that Nazis were supporting his candidacy. Rather than explain that, no, Nazis are racist skinheads, what’s he do? He says it’s a ridiculous assertion because Nazism was "big government." He went on to say, "there’s nothing about Nazism that would even appeal remotely to people who like what I stand for because I’m for limited constitutional government." Except Nazis ARE supporting, promoting and funding your Senate campaign, Rand! Would you like to comment? Yeah, just brilliant, Rand! Nazis support the extermination of the Jewish race, the most insidious sort of racism possible and everything that America has fought tooth and nail against since FDR's day, but that isn't as important to Rand Paul as the fact that Nazis, in his worldview, represent "Big Government"! I am sure my Polish Jewish ancestors in the 30's were more afraid of Big Government than they were of the gas chambers! Anyone picking up a pattern here? Strike #1. Rand Paul's campaign spokesperson Chris Hightower was fired for posting "Happy Nigger day" with Lynching pics at Facebook along with posts describing how he liked to go to the local mall in KKK garb. Strike #2. On The Rachel Maddow's Show and NPR Rand Paul, repeatedly, objects to Title II of the Civil Rights Act, stating that Businesses should be able to discriminate based on race. Upon learning of the controversy he had stirred by airing his pro discrimination views, he backtracks and goes into hiding/damage control. And now Strike #3. Rand Paul has received funds and promotion from white supremacists, Neo-Nazi's and KKK leadership via Stormfront.org This is sad that ANY character can come out of the wood work that says "stop the spending" and the tea party will vote for them regardless of what they stand for.
  9. tdslf1

    Conservative VS Liberal

    Did anyone hear that when Obama came into office and had that big meeting with Rethuglicans to reach out to them, Boner tan specimen passed around a memo before Obama got to the meeting place and informed all the Rethugs to reject anything he wanted to do and not to talk to him? Apparently from day one, they were going to say no to anthing. I was real sad to hear that the other day. I say throw all the bums out, incumbents be damn. Then put others in who want to move this country forward. On a better note, Dems will keep the House and the Senate, so hopefully we gain more seats to get more things done.
  10. tdslf1

    Bet you're sorry you voted for Obama now

    Title 2 , Rand's waterloo........ I found a new past time, Rand Paul's self destruction. Double down, baby, double down.
  11. tdslf1

    Bet you're sorry you voted for Obama now

    Originally Posted by tdslf1 Still waiting for a DISPUTE of ACCOMPLISHMENTS. PG says, There aren't any , IMO. I see the Fake Noise dog whistle is at work again. Facts just do not appear. Disheartning and sad.
  12. tdslf1

    Immigration

    What is your point about Chris?
  13. tdslf1

    Bet you're sorry you voted for Obama now

    PG, We are still waiting for a DISPUTE of ACCOMPLISHMENTS per Cleo's post. birds still chirping...........
  14. tdslf1

    Immigration

    There was no facetiousness about it. Keep 'em all behind the fence, then we will have no need for this outrage in the future when canadians decide that USA might be more prosperous.
  15. tdslf1

    Immigration

    Ari says, And again what part of this law is unconstitutional? Sorry, let me rephrase. The initial bill would have allowed legal immigrants to be harrassed along with illegal immigrants because of the "probable cause clause" with legal contact. This would have been unconstitutional to keep it that way. Now since they have revised the law, because they got people calling foul on civil liberties, it fell in line with more peoples sensibilities. This law does nothing to solve their problem. Drug traffic, murders and kidnappings is their problem, not immigration to that large an extent.

PatchAid Vitamin Patches

×