- Replies 2
- Views 1.2k
- Created
- Last Reply
Featured Replies
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3376765/Why-t-blame-slow-metabolism-piling-pounds-s-excuse-use-unique-experiment-proves-s-poppycock.html#ixzz4hhw13mpn
It is a pretty long read but they take 2 people, put them in a pod and monitor them for 24 hours. They feed them, make them exercise and monitor their sleep.
2 people obviously doesn't make for a study but the results are interesting to me.
The guy weighs 182 at 5'11 and has 142 pounds of lean mass.
They do not give a weight for the female reporter but her lean mass is 93 pounds.
His BMR 1656 and hers is 1224. Over the course of 24 hours he burns 2098 calories and she burns 1638. (This is why even if you eat to the level of your BMR you are still creating a calorie deficit, because your burn calories over that amount just living and being active in a day.)
He burns 1.15 calories a minute and she burns .85. However they are each burning the same amount of calories per kilo of lean mass .02.
The Dr's say that metabolism between age 20 to 50 is pretty constant and doesn't really drop off a lot until 80.
Exercising increased their calorie burn 2.5 times normal for up to 2 hours after exercising.
Just for a frame of reference, my BMR is 1990 and my lean mass is 123 pounds.