Hunger vs Restriction Argument
- Replies 12
- Views 2.3k
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
HeatherinCA 3 posts
-
L12 1 post
-
Dave_NW 1 post
-
ansoninc 1 post
I'm just curious... in my opinion and personal experience (I've been banded about 3 months) I feel the fills are to keep me from being hungry all the time... I have 5.5ccs in my 11cc band(which was my first fill), and I can go a good 5 hours without eating, I still have to police what goes in, I can over eat if I chose to (within reason, obviously not pre-band amounts), and I haven't had any stuck episodes or problems with any food. But I'm not hungry so I feel the band is doing what it is supposed to. Losing steadily 1-3lbs a week. Yes, pre-banding I thought it would physically stop me from eating, but I view it differently now, and now I'm not so sure.
Then I see people posting about having and/or wanting "restriction" from their fills.. as to stop them from eating so much, and people that have their bands filled to the max,... I'm unclear which is correct, or is it a little of both?
I don't wanna start a fight, I'm just curious what everyones opinion is on each side of the argument.