When excluded doesn't mean excluded...
- Replies 3
- Views 1.1k
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
010308 1 post
-
bradleybanana 1 post
-
MacMadame 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
So after calling Aetna and talking to the CS rep and finding out that the lap-band surgery is excluded from my company's policy, I called our HR reps. The one I talked to said that WLS is excluded unless it's medically necessary. This is sort of what the Aetna rep said but the Aetna rep was coy about it and I got the impression that it was only if I went self-play and later had complications that the complications would be covered, not that I could make a case for the surgery to be covered from the start.
However, HR person said straight out that if my doctor can make a case for the surgery, they'll cover it. She said to use terms like "medically necessary" when my doctor calls for the pre-auth.
I also got the number for one of our other medical plans. I have a choice of 5 plans through 3 companies and thought maybe one of the others might cover it. But our UHC plan, which is what they call an "affinity" plan appears to be stricter than Aetna. They say they will only cover it in order to treat a second disease -- such as high blood pressure or Type 2 diabetes. This annoys me because it means they don't consider obesity a disease.
I suspect that my last choice -- Kaiser -- would definitely cover it, but I don't want to change my doctor and I'm not happy with Kaiser here in Northern CA. (I loved them when I lived in San Diego.)
Anyway, I'm posting this because I know there are a lot of people who have posted that their company excludes the surgery. If that's happened to you, you may want to push a little harder and see if they have that "unless medically necessary" clause and are just not being forthcoming about it.